Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2429GU4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2429GU4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2429GU4
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 06:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 176
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 386
45% 348 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7
Parallax 2.9
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 458 466 442 442 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 438
Mixed 371
SusWrite 450
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 33.6
107% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZMPC032HBCD-000L1 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: CXM13L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 235
Write 86.3
Mixed 128
SusWrite 83.4
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 14.1
54% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 33.6
DQ Mixed 56.6
55% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 9905428-087.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2429GU4 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2429GU4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $505
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback