Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2P  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 17:16
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 113
44% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 200
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 74 117 43 41 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 369
Write 277
Mixed 293
SusWrite 65.7
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 20
67% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 93.5
101% 168 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 90%
Maxtor 7Y250M0 250GB
181GB free
Firmware: YAR511W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 44 43 39 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 57.9
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 38.3
36% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-DS2P Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback