MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 171
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 279
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 42.5
38% 45.6 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 43
Splatting 37.9
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 416 440 443 449 450 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 313
Mixed 364
SusWrite 419
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 34.7
136% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 185
170% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 100%
PHILIPS 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 8.4 7.6 7.1 8.4 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 7.7
8% 6.77 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback