Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime178 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 15:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 68
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 150
57% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 501
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
408GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 24 32 31 50 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 328
Write 201
Mixed 236
SusWrite 36.2
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 1.9
23% 6.93 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 364
263% 344 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 54GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 348
Write 142
Mixed 282
195% 258 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 3.9
1,025% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
3968, 12416 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 40
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback