Dell OptiPlex 745

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 745
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 745  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 22:12
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 68
40% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 130
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 9.4
9% 11 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 10
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 191 186 194 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.9% Above average
Read 216
Write 208
Mixed 192
SusWrite 185
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 30.1
97% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 46.2
38% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
545GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 91.9
Write 59.7
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 42.8
15% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 24.8
82% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 37.5
29% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95
474GB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 43 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 54.6
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 42.2
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.9 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 23.6
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 10
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 97%
KINGWIN EZD-2535U3 512GB
226GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
Read 32.6
Write 25.6
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 9.3
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 7.3
515% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 166%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
1TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Read 30.6
Write 24.3
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 9.3
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 19%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
240GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 32.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 9.4
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 7.5
528% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 745 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 745

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback