Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 05:03
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 296
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 998
94% 782 Pts
64-Core 2,200
136% 2,200 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 4003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 188
Parallax 194
153% 190 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 167
Splatting 139
137% 171 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 448 456 442 426 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 462
Mixed 455
SusWrite 414
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 55.2
183% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 201
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4P1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4873 4928 3057 1538 1182 923 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2,335
Write 4,662
Mixed 2611
SusWrite 2,750
702% 3,090 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 99.7
341% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,510
DQ Write 1,073
DQ Mixed 1,345
990% 1,309 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 425%
Great: 593%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.9 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 3.8
9% 8.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 9%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
54GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 7.2
Mixed 6.7
8% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback