Today's hottest deals

Oegstone DH55TC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOegstone DH55TC  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 15:36
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 346
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 3
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VB0250EAVER 250GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 58 80 82 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46% Average
Read 92.6
Write 98.5
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 67.6
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46%
Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 2.6
6% 5.72 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-181.A00LF 99U5402-434.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 99U5402-434.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback