Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 23:16
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 548
63% 491 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 176
Parallax 163
138% 169 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 138
Splatting 124
115% 143 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 124%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 76 75 77 71 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 470
Write 296
Mixed 285
SusWrite 80.9
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 35.9
135% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 263
203% 281 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
87GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 195 195 197 216 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 302
Write 145
Mixed 155
SusWrite 204
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 18.9
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 36.1
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 33.8
26% 36 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 100%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
46GB free
Firmware: S4500104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 287 286 297 274 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 432
Mixed 397
SusWrite 277
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 267
220% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback