Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '22 at 16:18
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 88.8 1-Core 138 2-Core 276 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 483 65% 484 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 115 Parallax 105 84% 108 fps	MRender 95.9 Gravity 102 Splatting 103 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB 2,741 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,680 Write 7,516 Mixed 2,568 1,379% 6255 MB/s	4K Read 649 4K Write 277 4K Mixed 377 1,614% 434 MB/s	DQ Read 1,984 DQ Write 1,396 DQ Mixed 1621 1,229% 1667 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 395GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 461 464 463 464 468 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 440 Mixed 386 SusWrite 464 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 64.8 221% 79.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 134%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 221 226 222 225 223 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 220 Write 219 Mixed 102 SusWrite 224 140% 191 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1.8 382% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 136%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 200GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 169 169 169 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 156 Mixed 108 SusWrite 168 113% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%
hp x900w 126GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 32GB free, PID 8140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 1.6 1.6 3 22 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 1.3 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 8 10% 8.72 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 16% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 27.2 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 34.3 SC Mixed 26.7 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	477x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	79x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $899

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16