Dell PowerEdge R515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell PowerEdge R515
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R515  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 22:33
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 4386
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 108
54% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 410
37% 310 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ibm-esxs HUC109090CSS60 900GB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: J2E8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 24 23 25 25 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
Read 180
Write 57.2
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 24.7
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18JSF51272PZ-1G4D1 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback