Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 19:04
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 148
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 201
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BUP SL 5TB
52GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 20.2
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 13.2
4% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.4
3% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 13%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 101 120 110 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 132
Write 127
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 112
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
466GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 19.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 12.8
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 21%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
41GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 8.8 9.3 9.2 7.9 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Read 31.4
Write 16.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 7.6
21% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
62% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback