Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 12:41
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 180
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 348
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 17.6
17% 19 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 16.4
15% 19 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,246
Write 3,692
Mixed 4650
1,007% 4,529 MB/s
4K Read 438
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 226
1,043% 278 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 563
DQ Mixed 831
609% 809 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
400GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 72
SusWrite 102
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback