Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '22 at 08:01
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 225 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 747 73% 598 Pts	64-Core 1172 72% 1172 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.5% Very good	Lighting 93.3 Reflection 110 Parallax 97.5 76% 100 fps	MRender 91.3 Gravity 93.8 Splatting 80.1 72% 88.4 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69 11,475 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 187 212 172 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 999 Write 170 Mixed 274 SusWrite 180 88% 406 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 42.3 150% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 520 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 234 200% 303 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 185%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 252GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 444 338 60 53 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 482 Mixed 385 SusWrite 222 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 52 170% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 265 226% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 126%
Intenso SCSI 1TB 453 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 813GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 134 134 134 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 144 Write 137 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 132 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 77%
SMTLINK CARDREADER 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 54GB free, PID 2801 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.64% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 3%
Intenso Basic Line 16GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 10GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.2 7.2 6.7 7.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 15.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 7 11% 9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 29.1 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 24.9 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,059

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)