Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 19:24
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 181
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 371
47% 357 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 42
Parallax 6.4
5% 18 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9
6% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
613GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 141 151 156 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 398
Write 247
Mixed 160
SusWrite 148
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 23
96% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 145
128% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 128%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
275GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 308 342 316 387 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 389
Mixed 352
SusWrite 325
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 40.2
139% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 271
216% 303 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 125%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
130GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 180 159 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 411
Mixed 384
SusWrite 154
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 47.3
163% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 312
234% 314 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 128%
Adata HV620S 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 39 41 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 38
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 39
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback