Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 601
66% 524 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08EA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 13
Parallax 15.8
12% 14.6 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 14
14% 17 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1343 1579 1655 1491 1311 1097 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 54%
AMicro AM8180 NVME 512GB
74GB free, PID e101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 33.3
Write 34.1
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 34.2
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 13
996% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 15.3
1,194% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 24
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback