HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE4h
Memory4.1 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 08:32
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3570-$49
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 146
59% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 274
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 20.4
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 219 214 218 224 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 236
Write 178
Mixed 201
SusWrite 212
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 25.3
99% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 172
136% 188 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
66GB free
Firmware: HP34
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 101
Mixed 60.1
61% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Flash USB Disk 17TB
15.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 9.7 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.83% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 10.9
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 13.1
18% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback