PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AE4h |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 19 '22 at 08:32 |
Run Duration | 307 Seconds |
Run User | SYC-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon W3570-$49
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
61%
Good
|
59% 99.2 Pts
|
34% 262 Pts
|
15% 248 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
|
17%
Very poor
|
17% 19.9 fps
|
17% 21.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 219 214 218 224 226 MB/s
|
61.3%
Good
|
46% 207 MB/s
|
99% 34.4 MB/s
|
136% 188 MB/s
|
![]() |
61% 80.6 MB/s
|
160% 1.13 MB/s
|
||
![]() Flash USB Disk 17TB
15.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 9.7 16 16 16 15 MB/s
|
5.83%
Terrible
|
18% 13.2 MB/s
|
19% 1.47 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
34.9%
Below average
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
48% 83.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 572x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 540x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 493x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 280x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 157x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 139x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 138x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |