Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6248R 23 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 6 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 41 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 210 60% 116 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 564 50% 426 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 139 124 131 122 136 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 214 Write 125 Mixed 172 SusWrite 130 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 9.7 27% 8.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 10.8 10% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 59%
Qemu HARDDISK 483GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 162GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 142 127 133 124 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 295 Write 162 Mixed 174 SusWrite 132 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 6.2 28% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 11.1 9% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 2x16GB 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 46.1 MC Mixed 34.2 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 231%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 118%

UFO

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 112%

UFO

CPU
Xeon (Cascadelake)IntelBench 62%, 31 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v4IntelBench 69%, 647 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
Hat VirtIO 86GBRedBench 49%, 89 samples	1x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $550