Asus G73Sw

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus G73Sw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110210
Uptime	7.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '22 at 17:36
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 119 58% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 342 37% 292 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2048) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.66% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.1 6% 8.53 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 8 7% 9.23 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 865GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 423 100 82 82 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 442 Write 416 Mixed 388 SusWrite 191 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 28 90% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 325 247% 335 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 128%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 123 125 125 125 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 73.5 Write 105 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 123 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 70%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 23GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 11 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 17.9 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 16.5 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 60% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

CPU
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	159x
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	160x

SSD
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 318 samples	24x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	19x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16