Asrock X470 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 02:14
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 226
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 759
74% 604 Pts
64-Core 1,227
76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 123E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 192
Parallax 201
146% 191 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 193
Splatting 127
122% 152 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 130%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 251 246 241 239 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 774
Write 596
Mixed 530
SusWrite 275
121% 544 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 46.2
159% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 558
433% 601 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 125%
Great: 254%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
277GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 79.7
Write 86.4
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 63.8
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback