IBM System x3500 M4 Server -[7383C5A]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3500 M4 Server -[7383C5A]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 46W9224
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131212
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 18 '17 at 03:06
Run Duration65 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 64
2-Core 129
57% 92 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 401
37% 311 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M1115 299GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 253
Write 152
Mixed 188
149% 198 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.62
174% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 24 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback