Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook S14 X430UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook S14 X430UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X430UA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181005
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 19:35
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 174
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 276
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1271) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 7.1
0% 3.3 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 108 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 401
Write 357
Mixed 281
SusWrite 112
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 46.3
159% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 225
186% 267 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S14 X430UA Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S14 X430UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback