PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C67 |
Motherboard | MSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200107 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Feb 13 '22 at 15:34 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 121 56 56 58 54 MB/s
|
129%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 936x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $110Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 353x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $130Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 252x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 274x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 268x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $218Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 214x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $369 |