HP EliteDesk 705 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 04:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 114
47% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 171
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 140 143 146 216 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 233
Write 223
Mixed 235
SusWrite 153
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 28.7
99% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 239
173% 223 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 MT Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback