PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds) |
Memory | 57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180419 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '22 at 21:20 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
73% 124 Pts
|
72% 599 Pts
|
71% 1,140 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
164%
Outstanding
|
182% 229 fps
|
174% 221 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 667 723 700 680 671 MB/s
|
188%
Outstanding
|
241% 1,089 MB/s
|
161% 58 MB/s
|
361% 524 MB/s
|
![]() |
346% 1,562 MB/s
|
199% 71.5 MB/s
|
586% 787 MB/s
|
|
![]() Intel Raid 5 Volume 32TB
25.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 11 10 10 11 11 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
13% 17.2 MB/s
|
93% 0.47 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD easystore 264D 14TB
9TB free, PID 264d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
26.7%
Poor
|
57% 41.6 MB/s
|
204% 2.83 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
116%
Outstanding
|
133% 46.7 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
53% 75.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-6850KIntel $190Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 205x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $107Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 176x |
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 104x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 181x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 92x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 64x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 43x |
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples | 41x |
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $922 |