Today's hottest deals

Biostar H81MHV3 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 21:31
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 468
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 31
28% 34.5 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 28.9
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 2.5 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2112XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 347 352 348 354 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 452
Write 320
Mixed 320
SusWrite 338
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 27.4
98% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 160
118% 152 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
714GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63% Good
Read 97.5
Write 101
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 122
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 109%
PNY OU6 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 6104
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 191
Write 23.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 14.1
48% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
44% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.8 8.1 8.4 9.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 6.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 8.1
15% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
207% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3 2.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback