Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory49.9 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 19:26
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 160
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 321
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M60
Nvidia(10DE 115E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1177 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 59.5
43% 59.9 fps
MRender 52.1
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 63
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 43 19 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,214
Write 107
Mixed 300
SusWrite 30.6
88% 413 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 0
59% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 434
DQ Write 40.8
90% 238 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 365GB
332GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 270 287 315 316 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 591
Write 554
Mixed 506
SusWrite 296
109% 487 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 18
57% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 303
227% 302 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 13 29 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 15
Write 21.5
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 23
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 23553 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 41.5
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback