Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 13:40
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 894
80% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,684
104% 1,684 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 172
Parallax 159
143% 169 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 132
Splatting 115
113% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
151GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 314 312 308 242 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 469
Mixed 445
SusWrite 301
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 49.1
170% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 1510 1502 1541 1598 1633 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,818
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 1,552
378% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 64
248% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1256
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1068
810% 1,095 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 302%
Great: 393%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 189 187 188 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 160
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 186
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 135 129 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 78.2
Write 119
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 132
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 90%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
11GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 20
Write 18.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 18.3
26% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.5
229% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.2% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 11.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback