Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-182

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C70-C-182  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 0681
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 22:37
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5015U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 22.6
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 60.2
26% 44.2 Pts
4-Core 84.3
8-Core 85.8
11% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F831) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 5
2% 3 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK128GCS8 SATA 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K8DA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 50 60 109 93 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 245
Write 130
Mixed 122
SusWrite 76.9
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 12.4
44% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 123
96% 132 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 302
13% 302 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C70-C-182 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback