Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C02
Motherboard	MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) (all builds)
Memory	20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '22 at 04:13
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 138 53% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 306 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.1.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 21.6 13% 18.1 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 13 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 13%
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.9% Above average	Lighting 80.3 Reflection 107 Parallax 70.6 65% 85.9 fps	MRender 44.6 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 59.5 49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 483GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 213 239 182 175 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 522 Write 338 Mixed 311 SusWrite 215 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 8.1 38% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 140 111% 152 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 3 479GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 192GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 290 307 276 248 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 253 Write 152 Mixed 133 SusWrite 293 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 12.1 30% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 77.4 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 72.5 75% 118 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 110%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB 806 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 134 140 137 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 139 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 137 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 201%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 BL8G26C16U4B.8FD CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 26.9 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 17.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	176x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	170x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	137x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	513x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	284x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	137x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $463

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16