Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20U8S12100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20U8S12100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20U8S12100
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 01:46
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 796
82% 659 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 507E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 19.6
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 17
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2027 2117 734 309 311 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,336
Write 2,173
Mixed 1,481
SusWrite 968
389% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 80.5
265% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,156
841% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 282%
Great: 279%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 43 24 24 23 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 159
Write 60.7
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 32.8
93% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.8
160% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 13.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 12.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback