Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86D4
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration2579 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 29.4
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 120
38% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 380
38% 311 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
HP(103C 86D4) 3GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.54.01
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 19% Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 107 119 96 88 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 912
Write 220
Mixed 278
SusWrite 93.6
82% 376 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 31.3
112% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 197
148% 201 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 2,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback