Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 20:13
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 46.4
38% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 62.3
8-Core 81.1
9% 71.7 Pts
64-Core 40.9
2% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 39%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 55.7
52% 63.3 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 67.5
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 378
Mixed 7.7
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 90.9
DQ Write 3
DQ Mixed 16.5
20% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
98GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 249 357 353 368 412 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 287
Write 297
Mixed 250
SusWrite 319
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 20.1
68% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 78.9
DQ Write 92
DQ Mixed 124
82% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler C10 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.9 7.6 7.4 6.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 4.4
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.9
10% 7.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 8.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback