Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q270M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191021
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 09:01
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$83
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 179
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 179
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 19
Parallax 23.7
14% 19.9 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.6
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$80
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 45 39 50 46 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 94
Write 94.2
Mixed 36
SusWrite 41.5
48% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 58%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$67
892GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 95 92 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 69
SusWrite 93.6
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Transcend JM2400HLB-8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback