Today's hottest deals

Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 18:25
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 64
2-Core 125
56% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 303
31% 252 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 92.7
50% 71.4 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 45.2
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$58
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 123 134 129 130 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 131
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback