HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 116
2-Core 239
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 653
67% 541 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8299) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 80 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 493
Write 436
Mixed 399
SusWrite 79.8
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 45.8
153% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 106
119% 208 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Ultra 246GB
28GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.4 4.6 4.2 5 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.2
7% 5.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Adata DDR4 3200 Adata DDR4 3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 24.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback