Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 17:52
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 134
2-Core 257
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 775
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 897
56% 897 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 113
Parallax 130
105% 124 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 116
Splatting 106
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 637 630 637 601 593 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 2,094
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 666
365% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 54.2
217% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 911
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 791
590% 789 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 233%
Great: 340%
Gigabyte GP-AG4500G 500GB
271GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2294 2336 2339 1014 464 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1791
Write 1,915
Mixed 1,786
SusWrite 1,486
394% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 71
239% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 870
644% 853 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 274%
Great: 370%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
922GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 171 175 175 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 165
Mixed 109
SusWrite 173
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
977GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 18 16 23 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.18% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 19.3
12% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 106%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
178GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 31 27 23 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 20.2
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 25.3
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 34.5
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 28.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback