Acer Aspire E5-476

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-476  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL AntMan_SK
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 168
53% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 278
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1218) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4785
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.17 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 10
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AST280 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 37 29 29 26 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 369
Write 292
Mixed 318
SusWrite 35.7
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8.8
38% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 41
69% 130 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
892GB free
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 136 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 91
Write 108
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 134
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.2
132% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-476 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-476

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback