Alienware 17 R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware 17 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 17 R4
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 10 '17 at 23:12
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 203
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 605
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 605
38% 605 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 0778) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 7.41
6% 11.6 fps
MRender 9.38
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 15.7
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 1TB
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20003A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 852
Write 378
Mixed 544
130% 591 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 15.7
75% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 24.8
107% 238 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 199%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 136
Mixed 128
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ECB5162C 16ATF2G64HZ-2G1B1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 18.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 R4 Builds (Compare 2,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Alienware 17 R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback