Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 23:41
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 960
94% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87D6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.26
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 28.8
18% 23.3 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 21.6
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TB
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 1238 1240 1213 786 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,260
Mixed 974
SusWrite 954
256% 1,139 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 71.2
241% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 466
425% 641 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 220%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE M378A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 28.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback