Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '17 at 19:00
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 843
81% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 124
Parallax 104
94% 114 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 105
Splatting 107
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 403
Mixed 411
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 26.7
148% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 43.9
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 26.5
34% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 134%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
209GB free
Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 501
Write 297
Mixed 347
84% 382 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 15.9
108% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 63
103% 198 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 7778
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 6.99
Mixed 9.93
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.63
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.13
30% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 35.9
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 23.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99M-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback