HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory1.6 GB free of 3.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 07:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B97
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 86.5
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 95.7
51% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 136
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4550
AMD(1002 0104) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.652.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 1.6
1% 2.27 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 69 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 80
Write 71.8
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.2
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 36GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback