Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 16:48
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$177
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 135
2-Core 267
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 808
78% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 C730) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 153
Parallax 151
125% 152 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 133
Splatting 119
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 288 296 285 277 269 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 310
Mixed 302
SusWrite 288
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 38
159% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 243
209% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 126%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
849GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 156 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 168
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 153
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
269GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 91.8
Mixed 65
SusWrite 79.8
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 88%
Generic UDISK 16GB
10GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.5 9.2 9.2 9.4 8.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 17
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 9.1
10% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback