Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive3.61% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 17:03
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 728
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Asus(1043 86F1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.8% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 157
Parallax 106
88% 124 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 88.8
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 107GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 27 22 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Read 32.2
Write 29.5
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 23.8
7% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
3% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 20%
52netbar iShareDisk 10TB
273GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 31 38 28 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.81% Terrible
Read 54.3
Write 65.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 34
12% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.5
11% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 8%
52netbar iShareDisk 240GB
17GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 31 38 28 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 57
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 34
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 3.2
611% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 23.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-H310M-V3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback