Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 12:22
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 73.6
37% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 61.7
8-Core 60.7
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 57
4% 57 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 15 27 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 61.4
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 17
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 60%
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB
1GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 3.8 4 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Read 3
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 3.7
4% 3.22 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 2.4
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM EPU Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback