Today's hottest deals

ASUS Custom

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemASUS Custom  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H510M-E
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 19:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 204
82% 140 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 658
61% 509 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 50.8
46% 55.4 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 46.4
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30021 500GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1565 1948 1612 774 758 692 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,220
Write 2,020
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 1,225
330% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 30.9
141% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 1,074
764% 971 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 206%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.7
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Custom Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

System: ASUS Custom

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $923
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback