Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 7RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 00:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 381
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 5.9
5% 17.8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 128GB-$126
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 152 146 143 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 486
Write 153
Mixed 201
SusWrite 147
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 34.2
130% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 148
124% 183 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
865GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 107 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 40.8
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 106
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback