Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101207
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 15:10
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-240
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 40.3
1-Core 15
2-Core 13.4
18% 22.9 Pts
4-Core 13.4
8-Core 14.3
2% 13.9 Pts
64-Core 13.4
1% 13.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 64 60 31 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 57.6
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 39.2
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.24% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 3
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback