HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B7
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 02:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 159
55% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 141
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87B7) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.30.01
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 289 296 296 298 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 909
Mixed 869
SusWrite 353
174% 775 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 49.8
168% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 243
191% 269 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 183%
SAMSUNG HM320JI 320GB
260GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 59 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
25% Poor
Read 57.6
Write 59
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 59.1
72% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SemsoTai 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-fq0xxx Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback