Today's hottest deals

Acidanthera iMac20,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcidanthera iMac20,2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-AF89B6D9451A490B
Memory85.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 14:05
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$499
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 290
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 978
93% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,860
115% 1,860 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 145
Parallax 198
106% 158 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 138
Splatting 97.7
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
PNY(196E 12FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 209
Parallax 240
178% 222 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 222
Splatting 173
176% 222 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 868 888 784 829 788 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,815
Write 2,074
Mixed 1,860
SusWrite 886
374% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 62.2
200% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 490
369% 500 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 212%
Great: 486%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 1422 1428 1414 1433 1417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 1,412
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 1,419
340% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 36.9
162% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 542
405% 549 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 224%
Great: 578%
Usb3.1 NVME&SATA 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 506 507 503 508 503 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 727
Write 361
Mixed 434
SusWrite 502
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 28.8
95% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 169
122% 156 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 129%
Usb3.1 Nvme 2TB
511GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 506 507 503 507 503 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.5% Very good
Read 325
Write 419
Mixed 431
SusWrite 502
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 26.9
87% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 170
122% 156 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
0GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,125
Write 10.7
Mixed 21.9
80% 386 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 15.4
85% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
727GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 84 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 89
Write 85.6
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 74.9
61% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
49GB free
Firmware: MN0KB6D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 122 118 117 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 85%
WD Red Pro 2TB (2014)-$140
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 130 132 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 129
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 126
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 93%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 68 73 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 50.3
Write 83.5
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 67.1
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
140GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 59 58 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 53.9
Write 59.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 58.7
68% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26%
Great: 49%
LD-CT CT 8GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.8 3 2.7 2.9 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 10
Write 7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.7
8% 6.23 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK 029E CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 029E CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 95GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 28.3
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 20.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac20,2 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Acidanthera iMac20,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback