Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory114.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 01:06
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$291
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 270
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 920
89% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,434
89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 195
Parallax 264
174% 224 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 223
Splatting 174
175% 220 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 160%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,603
Write 2,502
Mixed 1,921
522% 2,342 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 89.3
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,331
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 1,107
830% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265
297GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 130 142 131 127 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 446
Write 118
Mixed 257
SusWrite 142
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 39.9
145% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 147
116% 163 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79%
Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
358GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 428 437 428 438 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 441
Mixed 383
SusWrite 434
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 56.7
187% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 184 180 186 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 125
Write 116
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 182
81% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 128GB-$13
114GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 104
Mixed 103
143% 118 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.5
191% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 30.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 29.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback